(3) is what you would do if you wanted to lose the war. In whose interests he is really acting is a good question, because it's not the interest of the US soldiers on the ground in harm's way, nor does it appear to be America's interest at all.
If he disses America in one more speech or I have to hear one more dictator come out praising him and the change he represents, I may lose the last gasket I have to blow. Is it 2010 or 2012 yet? Is there any way to have 2012 come before 2010? - Bob > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Michael Madigan > Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 4:03 PM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: RE: [OT] Priorities > > All three are wrong. > > He wants to lose the war. He is the first "Manchurian Candidate". > > > > > It's either: > > > > 1. We really don't want to win the war, or don't think it'd > > be worth the > > cost. In this case, pull them out RIGHT NOW! > > > > OR > > > > 2. We affirm what we said during the campaign that > > Afghanistan is the real > > ball that needs to be watched, and the war we must win. So, > > if the > > commanders on the ground say this is what they need to win, > > GIVE IT TO THEM > > NOW! > > > > Obama's choice? > > > > 3. I'm too busy wooing dictators at the UN and pursuing the > > cause of my home > > town getting to host the Olympics. > > > > - Bob > > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
