Not paying import duties is probably more accurate... Steve
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pete Theisen Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 10:35 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Crackdown on smugglers of used clothing James Roark(The Dogstar Group) wrote: > http://www.reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews/idUSTRE59P3KA20091027 > > I'm not sure what this is all about... > Can someone explain what is so bad selling used clothes? > Jim Hi Jim, They hadn't paid the import duties. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
