James Roark(The Dogstar Group) wrote: > OK - it just seemed that it wasn't a big issue to me but I can > understand the import duties. > Thanks for the insight.. > Good day gentlemen, I'll go back under my rock <G> > Jim
Hi Jim, The Chinese are harsh. Those guys *will* be convicted and they *will* be in prison for about 10 years if they aren't joining the 10K or so who are executed in China each year. >> Wolfe, Stephen S Civ USAF AMC 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote: >> >>> Not paying import duties is probably more accurate... >> 140 tons is not a lot of clothes, maybe 5 to 7 truckloads in the US. >> >> >>> James Roark(The Dogstar Group) wrote: >>> >>>> http://www.reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews/idUSTRE59P3KA20091027 >>>> >>>> I'm not sure what this is all about... >>>> Can someone explain what is so bad selling used clothes? >>>> Jim >>>> >> >>> They hadn't paid the import duties. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
