http://bit.ly/q20IL

- - -
PRESIDENT OBAMA was too busy to attend the celebrations in Germany
this week marking the fall of the Berlin Wall 20 years ago. But he did
appear by video, delivering a few brief and bloodless remarks about
how the wall was “a painful barrier between family and friends’’ that
symbolized “a system that denied people the freedoms that should be
the right of every human being.’’ He referred to “tyranny,’’ but never
identified the tyrants - he never uttered the words “Soviet Union’’ or
“communism,’’ for example. He said nothing about the men and women who
died trying to cross the wall. Nor did he mention Harry Truman or
Ronald Reagan - or even Mikhail Gorbachev.

He did, however, talk about Barack Obama.

“Few would have foreseen,’’ declared the president, “that a united
Germany would be led by a woman from [the former East German state of]
Brandenburg or that their American ally would be led by a man of
African descent. But human destiny is what human beings make of it.’’

As presidential rhetoric goes, this was hardly a match for “Ich bin
ein Berliner,’’ still less another “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this
wall.’’ But as a specimen of presidential narcissism, it is hard to
beat. Obama couldn’t be troubled to visit Berlin to commemorate a
momentous milestone in the history of human liberty. But he was glad
to explain to those who were there why reflections on that milestone
should inspire appreciation for the self-made “destiny’’ of his own
rise to power.

Was there ever a president as deeply enamored of himself as Barack Obama?

...

Obama, on the other hand, positively revels in The Great I Am.

“I think that I’m a better speechwriter than my speechwriters,’’ he
told campaign aides when he was running for the White House. “I know
more about policies on any particular issue than my policy directors.
And I’ll tell you right now that . . . I’m a better political director
than my political director.’’

At the start of his presidency, Obama seemed to content himself with
the royal “we’’ - “We will build the roads and bridges. . . . We will
restore science to its rightful place. . . . We will harness the sun
and winds,’’ he declaimed at his inauguration.

But as the literary theorist Stanley Fish points out, “By the time of
the address to the Congress on Feb. 24, the royal we [had] flowered
into the naked ‘I’: ‘As soon as I took office, I asked this Congress.’
‘I called for action.’ ‘I pushed for quick action.’ ‘I have told each
of my Cabinet.’ ‘I’ve appointed a proven and aggressive inspector
general.’ ’I refuse to let that happen.’ ’’ In his speech on the
federal takeover of General Motors, Obama likewise found it necessary
to use the first-person singular pronoun 34 times. (“Congress’’ he
mentioned just once.)
- - -

Remember this whenever he bows to a king or emperor, or shakes hands
with a rogue dictator: His aim is to belittle his nation, in order to
enlarge himself.

Such a temperament ought never to be in the exalted position of power
in which this small man finds himself.

- Publius

"It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country,
under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object
of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to
subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign
powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of
them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be
avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose
situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful
and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to