A six-foot turd. --- On Sun, 11/15/09, Publius Maximus <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Publius Maximus <[email protected]> > Subject: [OT] The Great I Am > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, November 15, 2009, 8:12 AM > http://bit.ly/q20IL > > - - - > PRESIDENT OBAMA was too busy to attend the celebrations in > Germany > this week marking the fall of the Berlin Wall 20 years ago. > But he did > appear by video, delivering a few brief and bloodless > remarks about > how the wall was “a painful barrier between family and > friends’’ that > symbolized “a system that denied people the freedoms that > should be > the right of every human being.’’ He referred to > “tyranny,’’ but never > identified the tyrants - he never uttered the words > “Soviet Union’’ or > “communism,’’ for example. He said nothing about the > men and women who > died trying to cross the wall. Nor did he mention Harry > Truman or > Ronald Reagan - or even Mikhail Gorbachev. > > He did, however, talk about Barack Obama. > > “Few would have foreseen,’’ declared the president, > “that a united > Germany would be led by a woman from [the former East > German state of] > Brandenburg or that their American ally would be led by a > man of > African descent. But human destiny is what human beings > make of it.’’ > > As presidential rhetoric goes, this was hardly a match for > “Ich bin > ein Berliner,’’ still less another “Mr. Gorbachev, > tear down this > wall.’’ But as a specimen of presidential narcissism, > it is hard to > beat. Obama couldn’t be troubled to visit Berlin to > commemorate a > momentous milestone in the history of human liberty. But he > was glad > to explain to those who were there why reflections on that > milestone > should inspire appreciation for the self-made > “destiny’’ of his own > rise to power. > > Was there ever a president as deeply enamored of himself as > Barack Obama? > > ... > > Obama, on the other hand, positively revels in The Great I > Am. > > “I think that I’m a better speechwriter than my > speechwriters,’’ he > told campaign aides when he was running for the White > House. “I know > more about policies on any particular issue than my policy > directors. > And I’ll tell you right now that . . . I’m a better > political director > than my political director.’’ > > At the start of his presidency, Obama seemed to content > himself with > the royal “we’’ - “We will build the roads and > bridges. . . . We will > restore science to its rightful place. . . . We will > harness the sun > and winds,’’ he declaimed at his inauguration. > > But as the literary theorist Stanley Fish points out, “By > the time of > the address to the Congress on Feb. 24, the royal we [had] > flowered > into the naked ‘I’: ‘As soon as I took office, I > asked this Congress.’ > ‘I called for action.’ ‘I pushed for quick action.’ > ‘I have told each > of my Cabinet.’ ‘I’ve appointed a proven and > aggressive inspector > general.’ ’I refuse to let that happen.’ ’’ In > his speech on the > federal takeover of General Motors, Obama likewise found it > necessary > to use the first-person singular pronoun 34 times. > (“Congress’’ he > mentioned just once.) > - - - > > Remember this whenever he bows to a king or emperor, or > shakes hands > with a rogue dictator: His aim is to belittle his nation, > in order to > enlarge himself. > > Such a temperament ought never to be in the exalted > position of power > in which this small man finds himself. > > - Publius > > "It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this > country, > under an efficient government, will probably be an > increasing object > of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that > enterprises to > subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of > foreign > powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted > by some of > them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can > be > avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but > those whose > situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the > faithful > and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers > #59] > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or > medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
