On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:02 -0800, "Michael Madigan" <[email protected]> wrote: > If this article is true, it is outrageous.
On the face of it, yeah. But read the comments - the consensus seems to be that the guy in the shop used that as a reason not to have to fix it, because the internals were in such as disgusting state (it just happened to be cig smoke). Which I can sort of understand. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
