The cigarette smoke probably didn't cause the failure though.

--- On Mon, 11/23/09, Alan Bourke <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Alan Bourke <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [NF] Smoking voids Apple warranty
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Monday, November 23, 2009, 4:26 AM
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:02 -0800,
> "Michael Madigan"
> <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > If this article is true, it is outrageous.
> 
> On the face of it, yeah. But read the comments - the
> consensus seems to
> be that the guy in the shop used that as a reason not to
> have to fix it,
> because the internals were in such as disgusting state (it
> just happened
> to be cig smoke). Which I can sort of understand. 
> 
> -- 
>   Alan Bourke
>   alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: [email protected]
> Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message: 
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are
> the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or
> medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for
> those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
> 

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to