http://bit.ly/5euks8

- - -
While the White House is mum about who will be among the 300 or so
lucky invitees to President Obama's first state dinner Tuesday night,
word is already leaking out about who's not on the A-list, The
Washington Times reports.

Chief among the non-attendees: top Republican lawmakers.

House Minority Leader John A. Boehner won't be there; he's on
Thanksgiving break and home in Ohio. His deputy, Rep. Eric Cantor of
Virginia, also didn't get an invitation to the dinner.

The president didn't invite his 2008 rival, Sen. John McCain of
Arizona, even though Obama the candidate pledged a post-partisan
presidency.

Most senators will be back in their home states during the holiday
break, and few Republicans want to return to Washington for a party
packed with Democrats. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell received
an invitation but decided to skip the dinner.

Some top Democrats also found themselves out of the loop. Sen. Ben
Nelson of Nebraska, who turned out to be a pivotal player in
Saturday's health care vote, didn't rate an invitation. Senate Finance
Committee Chairman Max Baucus of Montana, who wrote the first draft of
the bill, also didn't get the vaunted engraved invitation to the
black-tie dinner.
- - -

Granted up front: President can invite whoever he pleases. Still, it's
revealing who he does and does not invite.

I can wait to find out who IS in attendance. I have a few names I'm
betting will never be published, but will almost certainly be there.

- Publius

"It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country,
under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object
of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to
subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign
powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of
them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be
avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose
situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful
and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to