Bob, You are correct. I went to the New York Times website - I suspect that the "times" he referred to. So I sent him a link to their article on "Hacked EMail".
We will see... Carl -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Publius Maximus Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 10:04 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Oops! Climate Change Data Dumped On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Carl Lindner <[email protected]> wrote: > In classic Ricardo style, if you are not intelligent and educated enough > to express your thoughts in a few paragraphs then you are not worthy of > the time I'd spend reading you.,so I just didn't read it, please try > again :) > > Once again Ricardo, you are one mucho tough hombre! Ok, Ricardo how about > this - a little dated - 2 days ago.... Carl: There is a reason he mentioned the Old Grey Lady as his oracle of truth, and not, for example, an actual organ of journalistic integrity. Ricardo's a victim of modern deconstructionism, where everything is political and everything is personal and so what matters is not actual reality, but constructed reality---i.e., the "narrative". I've never known anyone who relies on the NYT for his "source of truth" to live anywhere but in the universe of unreality. So, appealing to information presented in the last bastion of active journalism in Western civilization is not likely to sway our latin playboy. - Publius > > http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703499404574559630382048494.ht > ml > > Title: "Rigging a Climate Consensus" > Subtitle: "About those emails and peer review. > > The climatologists at the center of the leaked email and document scandal > have taken the line that it is all much ado about nothing. Yes, the wording > of their messages was unfortunate, but they insist this in no way undermines > the underlying science. They're ignoring the damage they've done to public > confidence in the arbiters of climate science. > > "What they've done is search through stolen personal emails-confidential > between colleagues who often speak in a language they understand and is > often foreign to the outside world," Penn State's Michael Mann told Reuters > Wednesday. Mr. Mann added that this has made "something innocent into > something nefarious." > > The Australian Antarctic research station Casey, where scientists study the > effects of climate change. > .Phil Jones, director of the University of East Anglia's Climate Research > Unit, from which the emails were lifted, is singing from the same climate > hymnal. "My colleagues and I accept that some of the published emails do not > read well. I regret any upset or confusion caused as a result. Some were > clearly written in the heat of the moment, others use colloquialisms > frequently used between close colleagues," he said this week. > > We don't doubt that Mr. Jones would have phrased his emails differently if > he expected them to end up in the newspaper. He's right that it doesn't look > good that his May 2008 email to Mr. Mann regarding the U.N.'s Fourth > Assessment Report said "Mike, Can you delete any emails you may have had > with Keith re AR4?" Mr. Mann says he didn't delete any such emails, but the > point is that Mr. Jones wanted them hidden. > > Don't you just love "foreign to the outside world". I am very impressed > that he uses that big word "nefarious". > > So, what do you think Ricardo? > > Carl > > "It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country, under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59] [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000001ca7171$f82bbea0$e8833b...@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
