I agree Carl. The truth will come out, or already has. I have been a sceptic for many years and this appears to support that. Always, always, always question the data! We should all know that being database types!
John Harvey -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Carl Lindner Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 7:19 PM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] Oops! Climate Change Data Dumped Yes, Ricardo I did take the time to check the article... For the most part I do check Calco's sources. And, for the most part, in time - the information appears to be valid. Rather than checking the "cover" of the NY Times you should be reading page 28 or so. So, let's give this a little time to see if there is any validity. I have not read all the hacked emails but there were passages that indicate I was not bright enough to understand the necessity of data manipulation. This reminded me of the Dan Rather discovery of the Bush document. Bottom line, they finally admitted it was forged. But, that does not matter. Even though the document was phony "if it was real it would have stated the truth". Say what! I normally lurk - but I'd like to keep active on this topic. It is of some significance. Carl -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 6:14 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Oops! Climate Change Data Dumped Carl Lindner wrote: > My dear Minimus, you have repeated this same argument thousands of > times. Now that may mean a couple of things. a) You think there are > morons in this list and you will convince them by repetition (you know, > the Nazi propaganda method). b) YOU are a moron and need to repeat the > same things over and over. > Please inform us of your choice, a or b? > > Gee whiz Ricardo ... > > In the business world records need to be maintained. That means, you save > your data in case someone wants to validate what you have done. > Of course, so what?..... oh! you are probably referring to the CONTENTS of MiniMe's article? I wouldn't know, I just didn't read it. If I read every article minime posts then I wouldn't have a life! But it probably referred to climate change being a hoax, didn't it? Well, I guess if that's ever proved I'll see it in the front cover of the NYTimes (or my local equivalent), and not in an obscure internet article dug out by minime. So until that happens he's just repeating his same old bullshit and will keep doing it because : a) he's an old fart and has nuthin better to do, b) He's being paid to do so, c) he's missing a few million brain cells. Pick your choice. [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/0e7801ca715d$649df090$2dd9d1...@[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
