At 09:35 2009-11-30, Paul Hill <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Peter Cushing
><[email protected]> wrote:
> > That feature applies to their truecrypt volume inside a volume. If you
> > create a volume in a volume you can deny that a hidden volume exists and
> > it would be impossible to prove it did as the entire volume is supposed
> > to be random data. You could surrender the password to the outer volume
> > showing that you have cooperated with the authorities and could
> > plausibly deny that a hidden volume exists but obviously not mentioning
> > "plausible deniability" :-)
>
>But is it resistent to rubber-hose cryptanalysis?
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubber_hose_cryptanalysis
>
>:-O
Graphics version:
http://xkcd.com/538/
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
