On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12/02/2009 09:14 AM, Publius Maximus wrote:
>> The debunking of the so-called scientific proof of AWG is the Left's
>> "missing WMDs" scandal.
>>
>> Now we can ask, "So where is that global warming proof?" and they must
>> admit, oops, we deleted it. But trust us anyway!
>>
>> - Publius
>
> Mother Earth is warning us that there is something seriously
> wrong with her, that is way outside normal cyclical changes.
>  I suggest we find out what that is:
>
> Proof:
>
> 1)  Rapid decline of ice over the polar regions of earth,
> (eg Arctic and Antarctic), and decline in ice from other
> regions around the world,  The decline in ice has occurred
> over a relatively very short period of 30 to 50 years.
>
> 2)  Loss of reefs and their precious plankton around the
> world.  The reefs being lost existed for centuries, but are
> suddenly disappearing over a relatively short 30 or so years.
>
> These reefs cannot be replace.  Reef only have a growth rate
> about the length of a dime per year.
>
> There must be an explanation.  If not global warming, then what?

Heaven knows. But the Robin Hood Ponzi scheme envisaged by treaty
under deliberation in Hopenchangen address the perceived but
misunderstood problem precisely how?

And besides, don't you find it a wee bit too convenient that the
original data, upon which all these so far NOT validated
prognostications have been based, was "accidentally" deleted... making
it impossible to verify their calculations independently?

- Publius

>
> Regards,
>
> LelandJ
>
>
>

"It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country,
under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object
of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to
subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign
powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of
them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be
avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose
situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful
and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to