You have based your entire argument against global warming on the fact that some scientists lied about their data rather than going outside those examples and look at other projects that show otherwise. Amazing. Do YOU know what the fallacy of mere assertion is?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Pete Theisen" <[email protected]> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 5:49 AM Subject: Re: [OT] 100 reasons why climate change is natural > Nicholas Geti wrote: >> You seem to have missed my last bunch of emails explaining my stand. The >> fake global warming emails are totally irrelevant to me. I was not even >> aware of them until a couple of days ago. > > Hi Nicholas, > > And the fact that they have been lying through their teeth doesn't > change your impression of the "settled science"? Amazing. > > Do you know what the fallacy of mere assertion *is*? > >>> Nicholas Geti wrote: >>>> Thank you for this article. It saves me looking it up to rebut some of >>>> the first 100 reasons. > >>>>> http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2009/12/50-reasons-why-global-warming.html > >>> Oh, please. It is all the fallacy of mere assertion. "Did so!" "Did >>> not!" Sandbox logic at best. >>> >>> Now when you couple that with the fact that they were caught faking and >>> lying recently, you know there is nothing, or next to nothing, to it. >>> >>> If a bunch of conservatives led by GWB had had an email-gate like that >>> we know it would be all over by now. We are only seeing people who ought >>> to know better looking the other way because they want to believe their >>> little darlings. > -- > Regards, > > Pete > http://pete-theisen.com/ > http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/f73002a5007e415789fdbdfedf22a...@dual ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
