Nicholas Geti wrote: > You have based your entire argument against global warming on the fact that > some scientists lied about their data rather than going outside those > examples and look at other projects that show otherwise. Amazing. Do YOU > know what the fallacy of mere assertion is?
Hi Nicholas, You haven't been paying attention. I have been tracking this issue for years, posting frequently about it. The warmest year we had was what, .7 (point 7) of a degree above average? The last several years have been cooler, and "they" are faking the data to hide the decrease AND changed their buzzword to "climate change" so they don't look like total idiots when the public catches on. Now they have been caught dead to rights, and you missed it at first, now you deny that it means anything? >> Nicholas Geti wrote: >>> You seem to have missed my last bunch of emails explaining my stand. The >>> fake global warming emails are totally irrelevant to me. I was not even >>> aware of them until a couple of days ago. >> And the fact that they have been lying through their teeth doesn't >> change your impression of the "settled science"? Amazing. >> >> Do you know what the fallacy of mere assertion *is*? >>>>> Thank you for this article. It saves me looking it up to rebut some of >>>>> the first 100 reasons. >>>> Oh, please. It is all the fallacy of mere assertion. "Did so!" "Did >>>> not!" Sandbox logic at best. >>>> >>>> Now when you couple that with the fact that they were caught faking and >>>> lying recently, you know there is nothing, or next to nothing, to it. >>>> >>>> If a bunch of conservatives led by GWB had had an email-gate like that >>>> we know it would be all over by now. We are only seeing people who ought >>>> to know better looking the other way because they want to believe their >>>> little darlings. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
