Vasik: > > You need to google "paragraph", especially it's semantical meaning. The > paragraph including you was in a completely different part of the post > and had no relation whatsoever with this paragraph that was explicitly > directed at your "sweatheart".
Geoff is nowhere near that subtle or clever. You might make such literary distinctions, but not the brick head from down undah. > >>> Am I getting on your nerves Minimus? Sorry I'll do my best not to >>> irritate you dear. >>> >> >> Not at all! Actually, I kind of miss your hysterical hissing and the >> blur of your dirty overgrown claws as they swing wildly through the >> air. > > "hysterical", "dirty", please let's keep work from personal stuff. That > kind of adjetivation (?) is ok for your extremist political rants (after > all, it's your job), but if you are addressing me personally please try > to be a little more subtle. > >> You must have been busy with actual work, or perhaps you sold >> your boat for one of those sex robots that Pete was coveting recently. >> ;) >> > > Yep! That would be just like Petey, he can't stand a real female by his > side. > As for me, tomorrow morning must buy meat, wood and carbon (?). I think you mean coal. > You see, > I have these 4 women invited to a barbecue by the pool tomorrow (they > usually come on sundays but this week we are doing it saturday), and my > ex is paying a visit on sunday, so no need for robots. OIC. "Quid pro quo, Clarise!" Must be using the wood to turn them over the coals. > I've been kind of busy, and I've joined Muay Thai classes in a gym > nearby, so that's why I've been deleting your rants without reading > them. I'll take next week off (it's summer here) and we'll talk then. Oh goodie! - Publius -- "It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country, under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/56f880751001150727n3a54a5b6ubc665f7a64d59...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
