On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Geoff <[email protected]> wrote: > Classic example of why your opinions are border-line insane and paranoid. So > it's 'reds under the bed' time again? Maybe you can resurrect McArthy again. > I'm sure you would be thrilled at the result.
They're not under the bed, they're right there in the White House, many of them with the ironic title of "czar". Or did former "green jobs czar" Van Jones NOT form the neo-Maoist revolutionary group called STORM in the mid-nineties? Did "manufacturing czar" Ron Bloom NOT say he "agree[d] with Mao that power comes from the barrel of a gun"? Did former communications director Anita Dunn NOT say that Mao was "one of the philosophers [she] turn[s] to most" -- and also NOT attempt to get Fox thrown out of the press pool? Did "diversity czar" Mark Lloyd NOT praise the "wonderful democratic revolution" of Hugo Chavez' Venezuela? Is he not supporting "Net Neutrality" rules that were devised by Robert McChesney of the Orwellian-named "Free Press"? Did Obama himself not train ACORN workers, after the philosophy of Marxist Saul Alinsky? Did Alinsky's son David not praise Obama after the DNC convention as the ultimate master of his father's political strategies? I mean, how many of these kinds of lunatics does the man have to hire, and how many direct connections between his actions and their thoughts do we need to prove, before we begin to suspect he shares their decidedly Maoist disposition? - Publius -- "It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country, under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
