Oh, it gets better:

- - -
One new area that has been given a higher intelligence priority under
the Obama administration is intelligence collection on climate change,
a nontraditional mission marginally linked to national security. The
CIA recently announced that it had set up a center to study the impact
of climate change.
- - -

IOW, he's telling our spies: Don't watch our enemies! Watch... the weather."

I bet it WOULD be cool to watch those blizzards develop in real-time
on the most sophisticated sensory hardware in the world.

Good Lord.

- Publius

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Publius Maximus
<[email protected]> wrote:
> http://bit.ly/7AiLPW
>
> - - -
> The White House National Security Council recently directed U.S. spy
> agencies to lower the priority placed on intelligence collection for
> China, amid opposition to the policy change from senior intelligence
> leaders who feared it would hamper efforts to obtain secrets about
> Beijing's military and its cyber-attacks.
>
> The downgrading of intelligence gathering on China was challenged by
> Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair and CIA Director
> Leon E. Panetta after it was first proposed in interagency memorandums
> in October, current and former intelligence officials said.
>
> The decision downgrades China from "Priority 1" status, alongside Iran
> and North Korea, to "Priority 2," which covers specific events such as
> the humanitarian crisis after the Haitian earthquake or tensions
> between India and Pakistan.
>
> The National Security Council staff, in response, pressed ahead with
> the change and sought to assure Mr. Blair and other intelligence
> chiefs that the change would not affect the allocation of resources
> for spying on China or the urgency of focusing on Chinese spying
> targets, the officials told The Washington Times.
>
> White House National Security Council officials declined to comment on
> the intelligence issue. Mike Birmingham, a spokesman for Mr. Blair,
> declined to comment. A CIA spokesman also declined to comment.
>
> But administration officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity,
> said the new policy is part of the Obama administration's larger
> effort to develop a more cooperative relationship with Beijing.
> - - -
>
> Well, at least we know what ObaMao and the Chinese delegation REALLY
> talked about in Copenhagen.
>
> Coffee boy got his marchin' orders.
>
> Seriously, this is insane. The Chinese are massively building up their
> military, increasing their cyber attacks on our infrastructure, hold
> our Treasury bills by our short hairs, and is (thanks to our suicidal
> trade arrangements with them) emerging as the largest economy, and NOW
> is the time to LOWER our intelligence gathering efforts against them?
>
> I mean, this is so stupid even Panetta objected. Think about that.
>
> - Publius
>
> --
>
> "It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country,
> under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object
> of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to
> subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign
> powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of
> them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be
> avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose
> situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful
> and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59]
>



-- 

"It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country,
under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object
of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to
subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign
powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of
them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be
avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose
situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful
and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to