Publius Maximus wrote: > http://bit.ly/7AiLPW > > - - - > The White House National Security Council recently directed U.S. spy > agencies to lower the priority placed on intelligence collection for > China, amid opposition to the policy change from senior intelligence > leaders who feared it would hamper efforts to obtain secrets about > Beijing's military and its cyber-attacks. >
Are these the same "senior intelligence leaders" who released the WMD's reports? Good! They are trustworthy! Besides which, saying "senior intelligence leaders" is just like saying "I heard it somewhere". They are not named, the info cannot be checked for truthfulness, the "leadership" of these "senior intelligence" can not be confirmed.... NOT ENOUGH PROOF! Give me the proof!!! _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
