This is probably why they should just spin off a company when new technology 
like that arises.  If the Office leader doesn't want to create a tablet 
version, then the spin-off company uses a different word processor and competes 
with Office.



--- On Thu, 2/4/10, MB Software Solutions, LLC 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> From: MB Software Solutions, LLC <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [NF] How MS conspires to stifle its own innovation.
> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]>
> Date: Thursday, February 4, 2010, 4:57 PM
> MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
> > Alan Bourke wrote:
> >> Interesting article from an ex-Microsoft veep. 
> >>
> >> http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/04/opinion/04brass.html?pagewanted=1
> >>
> >> He's right in saying that Windows and Office won't
> sustain them forever.
> 
> 
> It was a nice read, though...thanks.  I see some of
> that here at the day 
> gig, unfortunately.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: [email protected]
> Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message: 
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are
> the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or
> medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for
> those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
> 

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to