Out of curiosity, how long was it from initial concept (aka a hallucination
by some nay-sayers <g>) until you began to work on this project?  And how
long was it from when you first started on the project and its initial
deployment?  Did your background in law enforcement (if I recall correctly
you do have a law enforcement background) help you get through the red tape?
Was VFP part of the solution design from the outset, or did you try to use
something else and found VFP was more suitable?  Or, did you select VFP
largely because of familiarity (I do that, VFP works great for my needs, why
move to anything else for internal processes)?  Has anyone hit you with the
"VFP ain't secure" line yet?

I agree with our one esteemed colleague, this seems to be a viable candidate
for a competition.  Do you have competition in the industry yet?  Or are you
a pioneer?  If there is competition did you find using VFP and any other
open-source or freeware solutions gave you a competitive edge re: hard cost
consideration?  I know using VFP allows me to provide very cost effective
solutions.  But I am working in a very narrow niche market where there is
little opportunity to spread costs over a large field of users.

Geez, so many questions.  You have really gotten my attention on this one,
John.


Gil

p.s. - at some point you may have folks asking if you need investors <G>
heh-heh...
 
 
Gilbert M. Hale
[email protected]
585-359-8085 - Office (Rolls To Cellular)
585-202-4341 - Cellular/Voice Mail

Legal Advisory:  I have had a security expert advise me to embed the
following statement in all outgoing eMails.  Please read it.  The statement
below pertains to any person receiving or reading this document, whether or
not they are the intended recipient or have intercepted this information as
a non-secured communication transmitted over the Internet.  Be advised you
are required to comply with the following statement:

This email communication (and any attached file or files)  is intended only
for the recipient(s) listed above.  If you are neither an intended
recipient, or a person responsible for the delivery of this communication to
the intended recipient, you are hereby advised that any use, distribution or
copying of the information in this communication is prohibited.  The
information transmitted in this email communication, and any attached
file(s), may include confidential material protected by a privileged
attorney/client relationship,  may be an attorney work product, or may be
work performed for a client that contains confidential information.
Further, an attorney/client privilege includes CPA related work under the
"Kovel Rule" and other similar State and/or Federal protections.  

If you have received this information in error please notify the sender
immediately via return email, or at 585-359-8085


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:profoxtech-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of John
> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 11:27 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [NF] Sorta - vfp 9 app in the news
> 
> http://www.myfoxmemphis.com/dpp/news/local/030110-mpd-scanner-reads-
> plates-o
> n-the-move
> 
> John Harvey
> 
> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/051701caba1f$e5600c30$b02024...@com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to