In a manner of speaking it is as anyone can check the public records of 
the state in which I was married and learn those facts.

::michael

Helio Wakasugui wrote:
> Cool, so your marriage (if any) is a public interest affair, LOL.
> 
> HW
> 
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Michael Oke, II <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> If marriage was a private matter, the states (to use the U.S.A. as an
>> example) would not be involved with the issuance of marriage licenses,
>> now would they?
>>
>> ::michael
>>
>> Helio Wakasugui wrote:
>>> Oh c´mon, don´t be silly. Of course a gay person could be against gay
>>> marriage for some reason or another. I´ve read about jews who are
>> Holocaust
>>> deniers, so anything is possible.
>>>
>>> Now gay marriage should be private matter, people business, right? So
>> it´s
>>> specially funny seeing conservative morons getting caught in their lies.
>>>
>>> HW
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Michael Oke, II <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>> You were trying to say something, to everyone on this list.  That is why
>>>> you sent that message, had you not wanted to say something, you wouldn't
>>>> have bothered to click send.
>>>>
>>>> Is he a hypocrite?  I'd say that the jury is still out but the evidence
>>>> would suggest that he is.  That said, it's his business, unless that
>>>> affects how he does his job, then it becomes his constituents business.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not arguing with you, I'm asking you a question.  A question that
>>>> you are either unwilling or unable to answer.
>>>>
>>>> ::michael
>>>>
>>>> Helio Wakasugui wrote:
>>>>> I just wrote "LOL" and sent a web link.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was not trying to say anything to you. I was just laughing at a so
>>>> typical
>>>>> situation: a conservative anti-gay republican who in reality was a
>>>> closeted
>>>>> gay. An hypocrite.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now what's your REAL point in trying to argue with me?
>>>>>
>>>>> HW
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Michael Oke, II <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Not sure where the argument is but if that is what you think that this
>>>>>> is, maybe you should have your doctor check your medications.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Care to take a shot at answering the question or do you want to
>> continue
>>>>>> to try to deflect?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ::michael
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Helio Wakasugui wrote:
>>>>>>> I think you're used to "win" imaginary arguments.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> HW
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Michael Oke, II <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> So you don't have an answer to the question?  Don't worry, I don't
>>>>>>>> expect you to, way beyond your pay grade.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ::michael
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Helio Wakasugui wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Amazing. You really can't get it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> HW
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Michael Oke, II <[email protected]
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> You sent a message to this list thereby speaking not only to me
>> but
>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> anyone who choses to read your drivel.  Poor attempt to deflect
>> the
>>>>>>>>>> question that I asked by attempting to direct insults at me, grade
>>>>>>>>>> school level, at best.  Now, care to answer the question that I
>>>> posed?
>>>>>>>>>> Or would you rather hurl useless words in my direction as I am
>> none
>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> the above, not that that fact has anything to do with either your
>>>>>>>>>> original post nor the question that I posed after reading it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ::michael
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Helio Wakasugui wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> What makes you think I´m specifically trying to say something to
>>>> you?
>>>>>>>> Are
>>>>>>>>>>> you a closeted gay? Or a republican hypocrite?  A Ted Haggert
>>>>>> wannabe?
>>>>>>>>>>> HW
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Michael Oke, II <
>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you trying to tell me that you can't be against gay marriage
>>>> if
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>> are gay?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ::michael
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Helio Wakasugui wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-416241
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to