An interesting background you have there. I see the QA reference on your
KESU gig - and that's probably why they contacted you. But, it sucks how
they depend on the programs to find the candidates (the program may be
pretty good - but, it ain't great - as I hate it when they contact me
for 3D graphics programming - only because I have programming on my
resume - as well as work in 3D graphics - but, that's from the artistic
end). 

Sorry to hear of your "fall from grace". Don't feel too bad. Our boss
today tells a group of us in a meeting (QA Tech's and Programmers) -
that our co. does great in processing outsourcing (we processed other
co's data using our systems) - but that we SUCK in Programming! Now it's
the biggest joke around the co. here - and all the Chinese programmers
around me can't stop using Suck in almost every other word they say -
except all the other words are Chinese - so I don't understand the
rest...

-K-

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Virgil Bierschwale
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 11:12 AM

Long story, but probably a headhunter finding my resume somewhere.

Here is my background:
...1984 - KESU Systems (electronic tech, promoted to QA Engineer,
promoted to Document Control and Internal Auditor, promoted to Research
and Development..

Talk about falling from grace <grin>

Yep, I know what you mean...

That's why I get a very big kick out of people who say that there are
2.3
million jobs available in America.
Many seem to me to be double or triple postings by head hunters, not of
the
American variety.

Of course, when you factor in that there are about 154 million taxpayers
that work on a 1040 basis according to the IRS databooks and then you
factor
in 20 percent unemployment according to shadowstats.com, well 2.3
million
jobs will do nothing when there are 30 million out of work.

Virgil Bierschwale


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf
Of Kurt Wendt
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 9:47 AM

Virgil - since you are on this list - and discuss VFP with the rest of
us -
I would be curious to know why they sent you this position to being
with? It
seems to me that it is NOT a programming job - and has nothing to do
with
VFP (although they didn't seem to state what language the system was
being
developed). Is this a headhunter you have worked with in the past? Or -
is
this one of those e-mails that come Out-of-the-Blue, because a
headhunter
found you resume since some keywords matched???

Just curious...

As you probably already know - I am in NY (work in NYC - live on LI).
But, I'm surely no QA Eng.!

And - FYI - never got a response back from Colorado (hopefully, Virgil,
you
know what I mean without being really specific in this e-mail)...

:-)
-K-

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Virgil Bierschwale
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 7:45 AM

I have no interest in going to new york, but perhaps somebody already up
there would be interested, so I'm forwarding this.
 
Virgil Bierschwale
  _____  

From: Mona Dutta [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 3:44 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Immediate Need For - Quality Assurance Engineer

Hi ,
I am contacting you to let you know that our END CLIENT is looking to
interview and hire for a "Quality Assurance Engineer" and based on your
skills/experience I wanted to STRONGLY encourage you to apply...

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/289ea162f5642645b5cf64d624c66a14071a1...@us-ny-mail-002.waitex.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to