Ed, If you are you agreeing with me, thanks. I went into somewhat more detail a month ago or so about this same thing. One cannot look at a small spot on the planet and claim that its temperature defines the total planet temperature. Also the amount of water in the ocean far surpasses the amount of land both in heat capacity and mass. So the oceans are really the controlling factor in global temperature.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed Leafe" <[email protected]> To: "ProFox Mailing List" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 10:29 PM Subject: [OT] Wow, that winter was really cold! > Well, if you were in the US, northern Europe or Siberia. Otherwise, it was > much warmer than normal. The first graphic on this page is especially > revealing. > > http://ow.ly/1ldHh > > Canada is already calling this "the winter that never was". If you watched > the Olympics last month, you couldn't help but notice the rain in February > seemed a bit odd. But that didn't stop the deniers from focusing on the > tiny part of the planet that was a little bit colder, and claiming that a > little extra snow in Washington, DC, disproved all climate change science. > Apparently they still have trouble understanding the meaning of the word > "global" when thinking about "global warming". > > http://j.mp/d6dI0X > > > > -- Ed Leafe > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/f754a068429f4ed5b09beed24732b...@dual ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
