Frankly, I expected the Anti-Christ to be more... competent. Now, if there is an earthquake in Hawaii anytime soon....
- Publius On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Michael Madigan <[email protected]> wrote: > Still think he isn't the AntiChrist? > > --- On Thu, 3/18/10, Publius Maximus <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: Publius Maximus <[email protected]> >> Subject: [OT] ObamaCare bribes to bring earthquake relief to...Hawaii? >> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> >> Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 10:30 AM >> http://bit.ly/d1GDKv >> >> - - - >> Apparently, there was a devastating earthquake in Hawaii >> that we all >> somehow missed. >> >> Oh, wait, no. That’s right. There was no earthquake, and >> Obama is just >> totally clueless, as usual. In fact, the last earthquake in >> Hawaii to >> cause any deaths at all was in 1975, and two people died. >> >> In any case, why is he using this argument, anyways? He’s >> turned this >> health care bill into a one-size-fits-all solution for >> everything. Not >> only will it fix our health care, but it will apparently >> create jobs >> and give disaster relief around the country! >> >> Maybe I’m the only person who doesn’t get it, but I >> just don’t see how >> disaster relief has anything to do with health care. This >> is just more >> evidence that Obama is just talking out of his >> you-know-where now. >> He’s become this desperate. And you know, I say good. >> That means we’re >> getting to him, and now’s the time to push even harder. >> - - - >> >> Ever get the feeling that our modern politicians wouldn't >> survive a >> moderated high school debate exercise? >> >> Truly, a WTF moment. >> >> - Publius >> >> -- >> >> "It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this >> country, >> under an efficient government, will probably be an >> increasing object >> of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that >> enterprises to >> subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of >> foreign >> powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted >> by some of >> them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can >> be >> avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but >> those whose >> situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the >> faithful >> and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers >> #59] >> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
