The information you provide is cherry picked and spun, (eg twisted), to spread fear; an extremely contagious disease. Fear is the weapon of choice of the Republican party, that uses it for political gain and power.
Hitler and Stalin also used fear very effectively, but in the end truth trumps fear, and actions speak louder than words, especially words used to foster fear, uncertainty and doubt, where none really exists. LOL The actions of President Obama, and his administration, clearly indicate they are working very hard to protect the best interest of the country and the American people, much to the chagrin of Republicans. Regards, LelandJ On 03/19/2010 06:22 PM, Publius Maximus wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The history of Soviet Russia, including the Bolshevik revolution, >> Marxist Socialism and the Communist party, has nothing to do with >> President Obama and his administration who believe strongly in Democracy >> under the USA Constitution and Bill of Rights. >> > LOL, then please kindly explain why: > > * Obama's "green jobs" czar Van Jones founded STORM, an openly > communist revolutionary movement, in the mid-nineties, and yet Valerie > Jarrett, Obama's closest adviser, lauds Jones open as precisely the > kind of person they're looking for in the new administration. > > * Obama's Communication Director, Anita Dunn, lists Mao Tse Tung as > one of her top two political philosophers during a high school > graduation ceremony last year. > > * Obama's "Diversity Czar" Mark Lloyd openly praised Hugo Chavez and > his "revolution" in Venezuela (an openly "socialist" and indeed > "communist" revolution). > > * Obama's "guru" is the Marxist professor Saul Alinsky (under whom > Hillary! also trained incidentally), coiner of the term "community > organizer" and author of "Rules for Radicals," a leftist handbook akin > to Machiavelli's The Prince for destroying America's middle class and > ushering in a groovy new era of socialism. > > * Obama was a member of the socialist party in Chicago before he > entered politics "officially" as a "liberal Democrat". > > * Obama in a 2003 radio interview described the US Constitution as > "fundamentally flawed to this day," and bemoaned the fact that it was > in his words a "negative" contract, describing only what the > government cannot do TO you, instead of (as he preferred) what it > "MUST" do "ON YOUR BEHALF". > > I have a *very* long list of such observations. Please, start with these. > > - Publius > > >> Perhaps a little history is in order. There was a documentary released >> recently called "The Soviet Story". The link below is the youtube >> version of the documentary broken down into 9 parts. Warning - some of >> the scenes are disturbing. >> >> http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?174052-The-Soviet-Story >> >> or >> >> http://tinyurl.com/yd9pcye >> >> Regards, >> >> LelandJ >> >> >> >> On 03/19/2010 03:25 PM, Michael Madigan wrote: >> >>> Looks like the Communists finally won. People let their guard down and now >>> we have a Marxist as president. >>> >>> To think that the founding fathers risked hanging from a rope to give us >>> freedom and liberty and we just sit here and let the Bolsheviks take over. >>> >>> Disgraceful >>> >>> >>> >>> --- On Fri, 3/19/10, Nicholas Geti<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> From: Nicholas Geti<[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: [OT] Impeach the President >>>> To: "ProFox Email List"<[email protected]> >>>> Date: Friday, March 19, 2010, 11:01 AM >>>> It is indeed a sad day for our >>>> country. >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Publius Maximus"<[email protected]> >>>> To: "ProFox Email List"<[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 8:52 PM >>>> Subject: [OT] Impeach the President >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> http://bit.ly/drKQFd >>>>> >>>>> - - - >>>>> The Democrats are assaulting the very pillars of our >>>>> >>>>> >>>> democracy. As the >>>> >>>> >>>>> debate on Obamacare reaches the long, painful end, >>>>> >>>>> >>>> House Speaker Nancy >>>> >>>> >>>>> Pelosi is confronting a political nightmare. She may >>>>> >>>>> >>>> not have the 216 >>>> >>>> >>>>> votes necessary to pass the Senate's health care bill >>>>> >>>>> >>>> in the House. >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hence, Mrs. Pelosi and her congressional Democratic >>>>> >>>>> >>>> allies are >>>> >>>> >>>>> seriously considering using a procedural ruse to >>>>> >>>>> >>>> circumvent the >>>> >>>> >>>>> traditional constitutional process. Led by Rep. Louise >>>>> >>>>> >>>> M. Slaughter, >>>> >>>> >>>>> New York Democrat and chairman of the House Rules >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Committee, the new >>>> >>>> >>>>> plan - called the "Slaughter Solution" - is not to >>>>> >>>>> >>>> pass the Senate >>>> >>>> >>>>> version on an up-or-down vote. Rather, it is to have >>>>> >>>>> >>>> the House "deem" >>>> >>>> >>>>> that the legislation was passed and then have members >>>>> >>>>> >>>> vote directly on >>>> >>>> >>>>> a series of "sidecar" amendments to fix the things it >>>>> >>>>> >>>> does not like. >>>> >>>> >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>> The Slaughter Solution is a dagger aimed at the heart >>>>> >>>>> >>>> of our system of >>>> >>>> >>>>> checks and balances. It would enable the Democrats to >>>>> >>>>> >>>> establish an >>>> >>>> >>>>> ominous precedent: The lawmaking process can be rigged >>>>> >>>>> >>>> to ensure the >>>> >>>> >>>>> passage of any legislation without democratic >>>>> >>>>> >>>> accountability or even a >>>> >>>> >>>>> congressional majority. It is the road to a soft >>>>> >>>>> >>>> tyranny. James >>>> >>>> >>>>> Madison must be turning in his grave. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
