Leland: > You have really gone off the deep end with this Obama thing, Bob, > obsessing over his being the anti-Christ, evil incarnate, the bogyman > and even the Devil himself.
What are you talking about? I've gotten in arguments with Mike about this, precisely because I don't think he's the anti-Christ. AN anti-christ (of which there are many), I think so; but THE anti-Christ, I think not. What he IS is a radical of the "Liberation Theology" Marxist/Maoist persuasion, a leftist nurtured in the Chicago school of thug politics, who hates this country (a fruit of a deeper root, i.e., his hatred for his parents), and seeks to remake it in his own mythical image. The man's official biography is a web of lies and the truth about his paternity, nationality and faith is not what it appears---indeed, quite the opposite of appearances. You could discover all this for yourself if you had an ounce of critical thinking ability. > You're totally paranoid about President > Obama, and I wish there were something I could do to help you. Your > claim that Ayers was the real author of his book "The Audacity of Hope" > is purely conjecture on your part. I have merely pointed to the literary scholarship of Jack Cashill on this and related subjects, and to be clear: It's specifically "Dreams from My Father" that appears to have been ghost-authored by Ayers. Other hands were involved in "Audacity," a poor imitation actually of Ayers' trademark style. Get "Dreams from My Father" and "Fugitive Days" for yourself, don't take my or Cashill's word for it. The internal evidence is overwhelming, you can peruse it yourself at www.cashill.com; but last year external evidence emerged as well: namely, the biography of the Obama's by Christopher Andersen, who inadvertently confirmed Cashill's thesis, suggesting it was Michelle's idea to engage Ayers in the completion of the book, as Barack was stuck and behind an immovable deadline. >Convicting President Obama of being > guilty of all kinds of things simply because he could be associated with > other, (eg quilt by association), doesn't cut it. He chose the people whom he chose to be his "czars," and the facts about the far-left political sympathies of a large number of them are not in dispute. It is they now who are associated with him, not the other way around. > > You haven't provided one shred of actionable evidence that President > Obama is evil, masquerading as an Islamic extremist, has the destruction > of America at heart, or anything else. Remember, actions speak louder > than words, and all of President Obama's actions point to his being who > he says he is, and his having the best interest of the Country and the > American people at heart. If you only had a brain. > Conspiracy theories are fun to entertain, but > that's all they are; conspiracy theories. OK, Mr. Religious-Righter-TomDelayIsTheAntiChrist-NeoConCabal-Theorist. If you say so. - Publius > > Regards, > > LelandJ > -- "It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country, under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
