On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:16 -0400, "Steve Ellenoff" <[email protected]> wrote: > It was much closer to the 2nd version you said. I got the impression > they could continue if they wanted, but they thought it would be much > better in the long run to rewrite it to use the new technology so > that the tool wasn't obsolete before even being released.
Hummm ... well VS 2010 has just been RTM, I'm not sure what changes there have been to the two key features involved that would affect something like VFP Studio. Those features being the Dynamic Language Runtime and the Isolated Shell. I've emailed Craig Boyd so hopefully he'll reply if time permits. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
