I have always believed in incremental for every change. major changes were for a totally new addition, or major change.
In other words, you took the invoice routine and totally redesigned it. On 4/20/2010 4:36 PM, Malcolm Greene wrote: > On what basis do you increment your application major, minor, > build, revision (x.x.x.x) version numbers? > > We auto-increment our build numbers on every compile. We don't > use revision numbers. > > I assume that major and minor version numbers are typically > dictated on the basis of marketing decisions vs. some > hard-and-fast rule-of-thumb. > > Interested in how the rest of you are handling this issue. > > Thanks, > Malcolm > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
