That a lawsuit has been filed instills no validity in the claims made. There is nothing in that article, beyond some obvious erroneous information, that would lead anyone to believe that this will be successful.
::michael Bill Anderson wrote: > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Michael Oke, II <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It's uncertain as to whether they are violating the 10th amendment and >> I'm sure that, at some point, a ruling on this will happen. Keeping in >> mind that the Federal government has granted the states, all of them not >> just Arizona, the ability to work with the Federal government as relates >> to enforcement of immigration policy, they may take this opportunity to >> uphold this law. >> >> As to the 14th amendment, that is a non-starter. >> >> >> ::michael > > > Non-starter, meet reality: > > *http://tinyurl.com/3axtqbh* > > * <http://tinyurl.com/3axtqbh>*Bill Anderson > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
