It's very much up in the air as to it's constitutionality and there may be very little standing to contest it on those grounds actually. It in no way, shape or form attempts to supplant Federal law and thus, on constitutional grounds, may very well be allowed to stand.
There are other challenges to it that could have better footing and it remains to be seen as to whether or not those will be able to overturn this law. ::michael Ed Leafe wrote: > On May 5, 2010, at 10:59 PM, geoff wrote: > >> There would be blood in the streets if they tried that here in Australia. >> Surely that has to be unconstitutional? I know little of your constitution >> yet it has been a model for much of the world (other than gun rights). > > Yes, it is unconstitutional, and will likely be overturned on its first > challenge. But until then it is on the books, and in a state that was > originally part of Mexico, there are a lot of people there who, well, look > Mexican, and are going to be jailed for no reason. > > I wonder how they're going to spot the Canadians who are in Arizona > illegally? > > > -- Ed Leafe > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
