On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Dave Crozier <[email protected]> wrote: > Stephen, > I see your point but putting a DBC in a place remote to the table is a > little stupid don't you think and I would still blame the developer. Maybe > use of the DOS "SUBST" command could come in handy here though as you can > map any folder at all to a drive letter in a batch file outside VFP. That > way VFP would see the missing drive mapping. ----------------- I had that in the open dbc method of the actual dbc. :) PEMS got to love them!
> I still think that Ed's point about "you can, but why would you..." holds > water though and shows dubious lack of design skills from the programmer(s). ---------------- Requirement from COO of company who knows a lot about IT and data, still hates that owner bought SBT before he was hired. Anyway requirement was a separation of data access for shipping company(s) that they had what they needed and nothing more. The DBC looked to fill that requirement just fine. What if you were to publish SPs in your dbc? This is all about publishing VFP data to non VFP consumers. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer CIMSgts 901.246-0159 cell _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
