On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Publius Maximus <[email protected]> wrote: > I note parenthetically that the need to drill so far offshore in such > deep water is not because of the engineering merits of such an > approach (just ask the engineers now who are reduced to mud bombs to > stop it), since it would in fact be easier to drill nearer to shore or > onshore for the same oil; but because of environmental laws that > literally mandate it and make the whole enterprise that much more > dangerous, error prone, and harder to fix when things go wrong. ----------------
WTF? Or we have already pulled out of Texas most of the oil and this is the next closest area that has a huge volume of not only oil but NG. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer CIMSgts 901.246-0159 cell _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
