Hi Sytze,

I would remove just thos programs from the PJX (or all if you want) and 
rebuild the project, as you suggested and then use the Code References 
tool to search for the program names, just to be sure.  This should get 
all occurrences without much hard work.  I think you may even be able to 
programmatically drive Code References, but I'm not sure.

Frank.

Frank Cazabon
Samaan Systems Ltd. - Developing Solutions
www.SamaanSystems.com

Referrals are important to us.
If you know of anyone who would benefit from our services, please contact me. 
We would appreciate the opportunity to work with them.


On 25/06/2010 06:54 PM, Sytze de Boer wrote:
> I need to make some changes to a large app
> There are hundreds of users of this app
> There is also 1 client for whom I have done a lot of customisation
> When I started their customisation I did not know it was going to grow to
> the extent that it has
> For this 1 customer, there are now now 75 prg files and 32 scx files
> Probably half of those prg and scx files are no longer used
> What is the best way to check if the prg and/or scx is still in use ?
>
> I've had a brief look at Coverage profiler and am very confused by it.
> There used to be a very good program tree builder. Is there still something
> like that?
> I am tempted to "empty" the PJX file and let the system rebuild itself but
> that is dangerous because if a prg is built into a report, it doesn't
> automatically include such a prg.
> Maybe I should copy the whole lot into a temp folder and do this?
>
> Comments would be greatly appreciated
>
>    

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to