Kurt,

if the message is Richtx32.ocx cannot be found, you just need to copy it 
on to the target PC and register it using Regsvr32 <path>richtx32.ocx

Frank.

Frank Cazabon
Samaan Systems Ltd. - Developing Solutions
www.SamaanSystems.com

Referrals are important to us.
If you know of anyone who would benefit from our services, please contact me. 
We would appreciate the opportunity to work with them.


On 20/07/2010 10:49 AM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> Mike - after switching over to VFP9&  recompiled my App under there -
> the Spell Checker worked flawlessly for me (or relatively so). I do have
> some issue with how it works - and plan to try and implement some
> improvements on my end. And, maybe I could try to upload that changes
> back to Craig - and he can add them into his App. However, I am still
> having a very particular problem.
>
> Malcolm - I'm hoping you might have run across this issue before. In
> regards to that error I mentioned before about a missing Richtx32.ocx
> file.
>
> For one of my users - the spell checker works - but, it did NOT for this
> other user - and he got the above error. Then, last night - I had a
> thought. And, to prove it out - I had a 3rd user try the spell checker
> this morning - and sure enough - that person got the same error. Which
> seems to prove this - that if you have the VFP Dev. Environment
> installed on your PC - you do NOT get the Error. The one user - he has
> it installed. But, the other do not. Typically, where ever we have to
> run one of our applications - we drop the required Run Time DLL's into
> that folder - as I have done with this application of mine. But, it
> seems that is NOT sufficient to properly run this Spell Checker!
>
> So - I am open to ideas. Of course, the easy way to solve this problem -
> is to have those other 2 users install the full FoxPro development
> environment on their machines. But, this is not a solution I find
> acceptable - mainly because it doesn't seem right - but, also - because
> once the system is fully tested and running - I will be then having
> about 3 to 5 other users of the system - or maybe more!
>
> TIA,
> -K-
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions, LLC
> Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2010 8:07 AM
>
> Kurt Wendt wrote:
> <snipped>
>    
>> In the meantime - I am reading through this webpage - and it's a
>>      
> rather
>    
>> interesting write-up he did, on why&  how he created his own
>> spellchecker.
>>
>> I see that others have also contributed to his spell checker project.
>>
>> So - at this point - I plan to try and implement his spell checker.
>>
>> I'm glad I posted this message - and, I'm surprised that nobody
>>      
> pointed
>    
>> out Craig's spell checker back in Dec of 2008 when Richard Kaye
>> originally posted his question.
>>
>> But - yet again - this List proves to be a Totally Excellent source of
>> Help!
>>      
>
> Awesome!  Let us know how it goes for you.
>    

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to