Hi Everybody,

http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20101114/ARTICLE/11141026/-1/todayspaper?Title=Florida-insurers-rely-on-dubious-storm-model

or

http://tinyurl.com/3xc8tn2

"brought four hand-picked scientists together in a Bermuda hotel room.

There, on a Saturday in October 2005, the company gathered the 
justification it needed to rewrite hurricane risk. Instead of using 120 
years of history to calculate the average number of storms each year, 
RMS used the scientists' work as the basis for a new crystal ball, a 
computer model that would estimate storms for the next five years.

"The change created an $82 billion gap between the money insurers had 
and what they needed, a hole they spent the next five years trying to 
fill with rate increases and policy cancellations.

"RMS said the change that drove Florida property insurance bills to 
record highs was based on "scientific consensus."

"The reality was quite different.

"Today, two of the four scientists present that day no longer support 
the hurricane estimates they helped generate. Neither do two other 
scientists involved in later revisions. One says that monkeys could do 
as well."
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to