Michael Madigan wrote: > There could also be two threads, one OT and one NON-OT with the same subject. > > I'm not convinced that it was ever NF to begin with.
Hi Michael, "a fairly new computer program that raises your insurance premiums by a lot." isn't tech? If you say so . . . Oh, I know - every *word* of the post has to be tech, otherwise, only the cool people get to call it [NF]. Now I understand. >> I don't think any ONE person should be allowed to Drag the Thread into >> OT territory - while others are not. Its really EVERYONE's >> responsibility to police their Own actions. And, if someone >> is going to make an [OT] type reply - and drag the whole msg thread >> down into the OT Territory Drain - then that is too bad. >> >> As such - I have marked this as [OT] now - to hopefully >> spare the rest of the folks on the Non-OT version of the list from getting >> continued replies... -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
