You are drinking Kool Aid if you think the New York Time is more balanced. LOL.
Under Bush the Democrats hated him so much they spent all their time trying to eliminate him. As to your other points, yes. there is conflict but I totally disagree with your implication that the Democrat solution is the only right way. So I will not address each item individually. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Leland Jackson" <[email protected]> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 2:31 PM Subject: Re: [OT] There will be blood > On 11/25/2010 11:52 AM, Nicholas Geti wrote: >> Yep. He has a Nobel Prize but it sure didn't mean anything. I saw another >> article which said essentially Krugman is exactly that. He had gone on >> and >> on about how bad the Republicans were in the Clinton era and that it >> would >> be 50 years before the Republicans ever saw any power again. The >> Democrats >> had a lock on the American psyche. He is a total liberal/progressive. And >> yet he still goes on and on about how bad the Republicans are. >> >> I put Leland in the same category based on this latest missive. He is >> talking exactly like Krugman. In fact he might even be getting his >> information from Krugman's articles. > > Ya Think! LOL The New York Times is much more balanced than Fox News, > where I suspect you get your propaganda, oop, I mean news. LOL > > The Republicans control the House, so now its on the Republicans to > delivery, but the Republicans seem to only be interested in undermining > the Obama Administration; country and American people be damned. The > Republican's aim in undermining everything the Obama Administration is > trying to do for the country, and the American people, is to gain > greater Republican power. Power obtain in this way is unlikely to be > used to represent the needs and wises of the People. > > The messages currently coming from the Republicans is so conflicted, its > funny. For example: > > 1) Reducing the deficit is conflicted with extending the Bush tax cuts, > including the tax gifts to the wealthiest, (eg the American elitists) > The annual deficit results from the government spending above and beyond > its tax revenues raised during the annual budget year, so extending the > Bush tax cuts aggravates the deficit. Reducing the annual deficit is > not compatible with reducing taxes, so calling for deficit reduction and > tax cuts at the same time is a message coming from a forked tongue. > LOL At the end of each budget year, the surplus or deficit is closed, > resulting in a increase of decease to the national debt, respectively. > > During the Bush Administration money was appropriated outside the budget > process to finance wars, so this increased the national debt directly. > > 2) Reducing government is conflicted with having a large, well > equipped, centrally commanded, military, and government for that matter. > > 3) Reducing unemployment is conflicted with eliminating government help > and reducing the government. > > 4) Reducing the damage from a prolonged recession/depression is > conflicted with reducing the centralized federal government that can > help keep the country running on a more even keel. > > 5) Repel of the National Health Insurance program is conflicted with > reducing the long term health insurance cost of the American people. > > Above are just a few examples of conflicts coming from an ever > increasingly, extreme Republican party. There are some serious decision > lying ahead, and I doubt the new Republican House of Representative will > have the wisdom to make legislation that would be in the best, long term > interest of the USA and her people. > > Regards, > > LelandJ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/7157fca61ef3489da1ba57a5f30a9...@dual ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
