Jeff Johnson wrote: > On 12/07/2010 07:59 AM, Anthony J. Gundrum wrote: >> I was distracted by the 100 Hottest Athletes >> (http://bleacherreport.com/articles/440856-the-100-hottest-athletes-of-all-t >> ime#page/1) of all time article. A strategically placed fox on any of them >> would definitely draw more attention to FoxPro than any FxPro on a guy's >> shirt. >> >> > > I don't get it. I went through all 100 twice and still didn't see a > FxPro jersey. Did I miss it? > > Oh well. Third time is a charm. ;^)
Hi Jeff, When I clicked through it was the second one in. YMMV. The girlie shots are way more interesting, by the way. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
