On 12/13/2010 02:19 PM, Michael Oke, II wrote: > Leland, > You do realize that you are assuming that the bill that Obama rammed > through regardless of what the majority of Americans wanted, is > universal health care.
This isn't about stemmatics. What passed, whatever you want to call it, sure beat what we had, at lease for almost all American, but probably not for the Health Insurance Companies, and Health Care Industries including Doctors, Hospitals, Pharmaceutical Companies, medical equipment manufacturers, and all the others that were ripping off the system for every last nickle they could get their hand on. > It isn't and never was but you are probably not > capable of understanding that. Oh, I understand ok. LOL > Perhaps if a president, any president > not just this one, could actually craft a bill that provided for > universal health care, Americans might actually be for that. Well, at least we now have a start, thanks to the Democrats. I'm sure Universal Health Care will evolve over time to address problems, but Just because this legislation wasn't predominately written by Republicans doesn't make it bad. Regards, LelandJ > ::michael > > On 12/13/2010 11:18 AM, Leland Jackson wrote: >> If Universal Health Care is unconstitutional, then so is Social Security >> and Medicare. I'm anxious for the Supreme Court to hear this case; >> because, I'm sure they will not rule against fair congressional legislation. >> >> After all you have strongly supported the idea that it is congress that >> makes laws, not activist judges ruling from the bench. LOL >> >> #--------------------------- >> Excerpt: >> >> Opponents, including Cuccinelli, have argued the feds are stepping on >> the Constitution's handling of interstate commerce by enforcing a >> mandate. Specifically, shouldn't a person be free to make his or her own >> decision about insurance coverage? >> >> The feds have maintained that's a false choice because everyone, at some >> point, becomes a consumer of health care services. Indeed, the feds have >> argued, deciding not to buy insurance coverage has a profound economic >> effect that crosses state lines. So, either way, you're already part of >> interstate commerce when it comes to health, and that means the >> government has the authority to regulate your behavior. >> >> http://healthreform.kff.org/video-explainers/individual-requirement.aspx >> >> http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2010/12/13/132025701/virginia-judge-rules-against-coverage-mandate-in-health-overhaul >> >> #--------------------------- >> >> Regards, >> >> LelandJ >> >> >> On 12/13/2010 12:45 PM, Michael Madigan wrote: >>> Bye Bye Barry! >>> >>> http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/12/13/breaking-virginia-judge-rules-parts-of-health-care-reform-unconstitutional/ >>> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
