On 20/12/10 19:46, John Harvey wrote:
> I agree. I don't want to give up any freedoms either. Our systems don't
> infringe on people's personal rights, they work within the framework that
> has been long established by the Supremes!

The phrase was addressed to lard face here who seems to constantly
disagree with it.

BTW, the article does not seem to object your use of technology. I think
they are worried, and with good reason, with the drones and the FBI
files. We all suspect how badly those files may be used.
What called my attention is that officers have immediate access to
social security numbers. I thought you were not supposed to give your
SSN to other people, that it might be used to scam you. Am I
misinformed? And if I'm not, then I'd like to point out that info is in
the hands of a lot of officers or civil servants, and we know not all of
them are angels. Aren't you worried that info might be misused?


> John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Ricardo Araoz
> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 4:40 PM
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: [OT] Washington Post story on Memphis PD
>
> On 20/12/10 18:10, Michael Madigan wrote:
>> Awesome.   If your system saves one life or prevents one rape, it is worth
> every penny.
>
> "*They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> Benjamin Franklin
> *(but of course he must have been bloody liberal, not worthy of being a
> US citizen)


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to