On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Rick Schummer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I think SET DELETED ON will result in rushmore returning partial<< > > That can be solved with an index on DELETED(). Best to use a Binary index if > you are using VFP 9 for this index. -------------------
Why not combine the index on the search column and include deleted() with it? A compound index is superior when it covers the true join and filtration required by the request. Adding additional indexes are probably a feel good only and are not ever used by the engine. Granted we have no idea what the engine is using when it only tells you "partial" as an answer. What kind of crap is that? Words like index scan, index seek, table scan make sense in helping the developer tweak what is going on as well as in what aspect of the operation that it is taking place. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer CIMSgts 901.246-0159 cell _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
