On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Tina Currie <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmmm... Good to know. > > I currently have a system that used to run quite quickly (data lives on > network and there are now 7 machines accessing it simultaneously) but it has > s-l-o-w-e-d right down recently so I too have been investigating Rushmore > Optimisation. The tables have a TON of deleted records now and this gives > me one more place to look for speeding it all up. -------------
Why not copy to delTableName for deleted(). Then pack the table? If you have a lot then it might help a little. In that you don't have to suck them down local over the network. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer CIMSgts 901.246-0159 cell _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
