On 03/11/2011 06:36 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Mar 10, 2011, at 6:42 PM, Dan Covill wrote: > >> I'm with Al. I try to top-post, unless the context is really critical. >> Has top-posting been declared evil? > > Dan, you're a young'un, so you probably don't remember the days before > Outlook. :) > > Besides making things hard to read, it encourages people to not trim > their replies. Observe any thread dominated by top posters, and you'll see > reams and reams of useless quoted garbage below any actual useful content. > > Most people who top-post do so because they use an email client that > defaults to that style. They click 'Reply', type a few words, and hit send. > No thought is given to composition, much less trimming. > > The ideal method of replying is inline comments, with trimming off all > the non-relevant quoted text. That way you have sufficient context to > understand what the writer is responding to, and are also able to read it in > a much more conversational style. > > > > -- Ed Leafe > > I have noticed that Ed's emails are of the most consistent I have seen! I send more emails to customers than I do on these lists. I prefer bottom posting on with this content with trimming so that I can quickly get up to speed on a thread that I haven't been following. I tried bottom posting with some of my customers and quickly abandoned it because they kept asking me why I resent them their email with nothing added. ;^)
Jeff --------------- Jeff Johnson [email protected] (623) 582-0323 www.san-dc.com _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
