On 4/14/2011 1:44 PM, Michael Madigan wrote:
>> >  This "9/11 was an inside job" garbage proves he's insane.
> Pretty much...although his argument about him knowing demolition from
> his Navy Seal days and the towers coming straight down in a
> controlled-like demolition are somewhat interesting.
>
> And the part about the Pentagon and "where's the pieces of the jet?" and
> some point about jet fuel not burning hot enough to melt the steel
> girters...
While I agree that the way the towers "collapsed" was interesting, I 
would ask "What comparable demolition has taken place?" In other words, 
what examples of building demolition can we inspect where a 110-story 
tower was "dropped" into its own basement? Even the Sands hotel in Las 
Vegas was (dunno the proper terminology to use here) destructed in such 
a way that it fell somewhat sideways...and it was a lot shorter!

As for the pieces of jet, again, what studies have been done to show 
what a passenger jet will do when it encounters 10-feet thick steel 
reinforced walls while traveling at 500+ mph? If that was actually a 
cruise missile, then someone got ripped off on that explosive! Maybe 
Mythbusters could tackle this one!

As for melting steel girders, my understanding was that nothing 
"melted", but when you heat steel to 1,500+ degrees it kinda gets sorta 
squishy and looses it's ability to support several thousand tons of 
weight above it. Gravity takes over when steel looses its resolve (much 
like progressives and the defense of liberty).

Mike

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to