On 4/29/2011 3:14 PM, Paul McNett wrote: > On 4/29/11 12:07 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: >> On 4/29/2011 3:04 PM, Paul McNett wrote: >>> Subversion was the source control system to use ten years ago. It is still >>> as good as >>> it ever was, but there are better choices these days. Starting fresh today, >>> I'd pick >>> Mercurial or Git. >> >> >> Why do you like these over Subversion? > > Never used 'em, but I trust the people I listen to. I still use Subversion > because it > works well enough for me, but Mercurial and Git are distributed version > control > systems, which means they make it much more convenient to collaborate with > others. > > We still use Subversion for Dabo, but at some point when it makes sense to do > so I'll > move it forward to Git or Mercurial.
And do those work with Windows systems? I know you're a non-Windows guy some (or most) of the time for your work. -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
