On Apr 29, 2011, at 12:07 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:

>> Subversion was the source control system to use ten years ago. It is still 
>> as good as
>> it ever was, but there are better choices these days. Starting fresh today, 
>> I'd pick
>> Mercurial or Git.
> 
> Why do you like these over Subversion?


        With git, you can make multiple local commits - I sometimes do dozens a 
day. This is great for both when you want to try something out and be able to 
recover easily, as well as for when you screw things up and need to get back to 
a known good state. 

        Since Dabo uses a Subversion repo, I can't commit to it without 
affecting everyone else, so I use git locally when working, and when I'm 
confident in my changes, I commit to Subversion. Were Dabo to move to GitHub 
for its repo, I would work the same locally, and then instead of a running 'svn 
commit', I'd do a 'git push' to push my changes to github.



-- Ed Leafe




_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to