El 08/10/12 07:09, Michael Madigan escribió:
Tax the rich and the rich move to a different country. Brilliant!
Now if a rich man cannot be taxed, what is his use? Why would you want him near? Because he employs other people? This has been proven false time and again. Besides if you don't tax the rich man you'll necessarily need to spread that tax among the less fortunate, who are the ones this rich man will employ, thus taxing him indirectly. Unless you propose to not tax the rich man nor the rich man employees. But then, of what use would he be to society? The only usefulness of a non tax paying rich man would be that he brings money to the country. But then again, if he invests in industry he'll be taxed, so he'll put his money in speculative funds which are not taxed. So once again, what good is it to have him in the country? Speculative funds will not create wealth, moreover, they tend to unbalance the economy.
Bottom line... you are stupid.... but then again, we all new that. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
