On 10/16/2012 04:07 PM, lelandj wrote:
On 10/16/2012 02:33 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 10/16/2012 03:26 PM, lelandj wrote:
On 10/16/2012 01:59 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 10/16/2012 02:51 PM, lelandj wrote:
On 10/16/2012 01:41 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 10/16/2012 02:23 PM, lelandj wrote:
He doesn't deserve the support, but still he gets it.
""Remember, this was an attack that went on for hours," Clinton
said
in an interview with Fox News during a trip to Peru."
Read more:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/15/clinton-takes-responsibility-for-consulate-security-blames-confusion-on-fog-war/#ixzz29RCROczr
Really? Does it take hours to get fighter jets, drones and
paratroops
anywhere in the middle east? They could have asked Israel, for
heaven's sake!
The state department has not yet gotten to the bottom of this,
including
the motive behind the attack. The Israeli Mossad could be behind
it for
all I know with the motive of giving Mitt Romney's campaign
ammunition
with which to attack President Obama.
The relationship between Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of
Israel,
and President Obama doesn't seem to be on the best of terms
No excuse is possible - Bammer could have had Bush ask him!
Anything is possible. I'm not getting mush out of "Bammer could have
had Bush ask him". Could you explain.
"mush" should be right up your alley. I meant, if relations between
Bammer and Bibi are really that bad, either HW or W could give Bibi a
call for help - THEY are on good terms with him!
I think Israel would help even Bammer diplomatic insults aside if an
embassy is under attack, as it was. If they got there before the
building was breached, and they might have, the four US citizens would
have been saved. AK47s and RPGs can't match the Gatling guns on the
jets. What if Israeli jets had been on manoeuvres 20 miles away?
I'll bet the marines are in the embassies now!
It's easy to criticize all the parties involved in their handling of the
assault on the USA consulate in Benghazi, using hindsight, and point out
all the "What if" scenarios that might have prevented the attack or
saved the lives of the Americans serving in the Libya, but that's
fantasy; not reality. LOL
So, if there is another fatal attack, you will still excuse the Bammer
and preach understanding of the Muslims rather than acknowledge a
failure of the Obama administration and a de facto war with Islam?
Interesting.
I still don't understand the motive behind the attack on the consulate
in Libya. There have been attacks by terrorist on American embassies,
and other targets, forever, but usually we hear from the perpetrators,
as to their reasons.
Hi Leland,
That's easy: Jihad.
Stopping all such attacks might not be cost effective or even possible.
Meds, Leland, you need meds.
--
Regards,
Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
