Actually, I'd like to have that information also. I had it once, but that
was when Ed lived in Penfield, NY.
Thanks.
PabloSr
"Sea cortés, ande con cuidado, edúquese lo más que pueda,
respete para que lo respeten, y que Dios nos ampare a todos!" Dra. A.M. Polo
* -----Original Message-----
* From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
* Wes Wilson
* Sent: October 17, 2012 11:19 AM
* To: [email protected]
* Subject: Re: ProFox Digest, Vol 114, Issue 67
*
* I am new to profox. If I want to make a contribution, is this the email
address
* to do so?
*
* Thanks
* Wes
*
* Wes Wilson, President
* ERW Custom Programming, Inc.
* Crescent Lake Plaza
* 5459 Elizabeth Lake Rd.
* Waterford, MI 48327
* (248) 683-4182
* http://www.erw.com/
*
*
*
* ________________________________
* From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
* To: [email protected]
* Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:10 AM
* Subject: ProFox Digest, Vol 114, Issue 67
*
* ----- Forwarded Message -----
*
* Send ProFox mailing list submissions to
* [email protected]
*
* To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
* http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
* or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
* [email protected]
*
* You can reach the person managing the list at
* [email protected]
*
* When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re:
* Contents of ProFox digest..."
*
* Today's Topics:
*
* 1. Re: [OT] Hil takes one for the Bammer (Pete Theisen)
* 2. Re: Crazy? (Alan Bourke)
* 3. Re: Crazy? (Mike Copeland)
* 4. Re: [OT] Hil takes one for the Bammer (Ricardo Ar?oz)
* 5. Re: [OT] Debate (Ricardo Ar?oz)
* 6. Re: [OT] Debate (Ricardo Ar?oz)
* 7. RE: Crazy? (Kurt Wendt)
* 8. Re: [OT] Hil takes one for the Bammer (lelandj)
* 9. Re: Crazy? (MB Software Solutions, LLC)
* 10. Re: [OT] Debate (Michael Madigan)
* 11. Re: [OT] Debate (Michael Madigan)
* 12. Re: [OT] Debate (Stephen Russell)
* 13. Re: [OT] Debate (lelandj)
* 14. Re: [OT] Debate (Ricardo Ar?oz)
* 15. Re: [OT] Debate (Michael Oke, II)
* On 10/17/2012 02:28 AM, geoff wrote:
* > We wouldn't send in the army or air-force into another country's
* > sovereign territory to do so. That is an act of war which of course is
how you
* think.
* > But also, we dont act like arrogant pricks, ignoring everyone elses
* > laws and rights as you do. That is the cause of the problem. the rest
* > of the world can manage not to get their embassies attacked. Why cant
you?
*
* Hi Geoff,
*
* I have been reading here and there that this or that country closed an
embassy
* "temporarily", which I would advocate our doing. Say we had one middle
east
* embassy in Israel. Anyone in the middle east wants to do business with the
US
* government, drop on by - nice central location.
*
* It would be a secure facility with only one window in the compound wall, a
* sort of bank teller or jail visit arrangement. If anyone were to shoot,
the glass
* would be 6" thick. A mail room to receive documents where the military
* would screen them.
*
* Of course, this would cost a few in the third world their jobs, but they
would
* have brought it upon themselves.
*
* This latest episode would not have happened.
* -- Regards,
*
* Pete
* http://pete-theisen.com/
* http://elect-pete-theisen.com/
*
*
*
*
* On Tue, Oct 16, 2012, at 10:06 PM, Mike Copeland wrote:
* > Here's what might be a crazy idea...
*
* Yes. The public internet isn't fast or stable or secure enough. Do it
properly
* with web services.
* --
* Alan Bourke
* alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
*
*
*
* I really appreciate you taking the time to clarify this, Christof! It
makes sense
* that the protocol would need to support record-locking and concurrent
* access. Sounds like a great recipe for corrupted data. And yes, the
latency is a
* huge issue. Sounds like unless the files are really small and the number
of
* concurrent users is small, it's a really bad idea. Crazy even!
*
* Thanks again.
*
* Mike
*
* -------- Original Message --------
* Subject: Re: Crazy?
* From: Christof Wollenhaupt <[email protected]>
* To: [email protected]
* Date: 10/16/2012 7:56 PM
* > What if someone were to set up a Windows share drive from a Cloud drive
* > service...like Rackspace offers?
*
* > Would that file share source be
* > a) acceptable to Foxpro for file locks, buffers, etc
* > b) prone to index corruption
* > c) speedy enough to serve the purpose?
* >
* I've done a session on this topic a while ago... The only protocol that
* supports record locking and concurrent access is SMB/CIFS. That's an
* non-encrypted protocol that needs to be supplemented by a VPN channel,
* whatever sort of. What's killing the whole thing, though, is the increase
* in latency. You go from <1 ms on a local LAN to over 30 ms (and that's a
* good connection). Even if the bandwidth is high (like my 100 MBit
* connection at home), it's still at least 30 times slower than a local
* network drive with the same transfer speed (100 MBit LAN).
*
*
*
*
* El 17/10/12 02:42, geoff escribió:
* > wow... you make my own point even better than I do. your way around
* every
* > problem is to declare war? Do you really yet understand why the USA is
* > growing more hated every day? It is because of answers like this. You
are a
* > bully.
*
* No *he *is not. He is just an old fag coward. I'm sure if this were a real
* conversation and I went up and slapped him all we would get are sobs.
*
* > Your country is a bully. And when someone blows stuff up and kills
* > some of your people you cry and then wonder why it all happened and why
* > people hate you.
*
* But of course. Now let me correct you, nobody killed some of their people,
* they were just "collateral damage".
*
* > Bring on the next Cold War. Maybe that will shut you lot up and keep you
* > from treating the entire world as your rightful playground.
* >
* >
*
* And here again is the reaction you blokes provoke.
* And please note that he is Christian, native English speaker, educated,
member
* of the commonwealth, etc. etc.
* Now what reaction do you think you can expect from people from different
* cultures?
*
* On a last personal note, Geoff.
* I have little old coward blacklisted in my computer so as not to have to
read all
* the hatred that pours constantly out of his mouth. I am glad he's built
his own
* hell but I don't want to be dragged in to it. Would you please not cite
him, or
* just cite little pieces of his dirt when you answer? So that I don't get
so much
* mud in my eyes?
* Thanks
*
*
*
*
* --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
* multipart/alternative
* text/plain (text body -- kept)
* text/html
* ---
*
*
* El 17/10/12 02:09, Nicholas Geti escribió:
* > Did any of you notice that Obama spent almost the entire time accusing
Mitt
* of all kinds of nefarious motives but never said anything about what he
would
* do in the next four years? It was a pathetic display. He was constantly
putting
* words into Mitt's mouth. That is how the liberals attempt to move their
hidden
* agenda. It is always accuse the conservatives of doing something they
hate;
* never tell anyone how they would do it. We find out what they would do
after
* the fact.
*
* Yet he won this debate.
* Suck it up!!!
*
*
*
* El 17/10/12 02:12, Michael Madigan escribió:
* > He was a spectacular failure for his first 4 years, what kind of idiot
would
* give him 4 more?
* >
* >
*
* Errhhhhh..... that 54% of the people Mitt the shit despises?
* The ones he said would never vote for him because they were drinking
* from govt tits?
*
*
*
* If that's how it works - then, seems you have looked into it a LOT more
* than I have. I know of it - but, only peeked at it peripherally - as I
* didn't have a specific need yet for which I needed a specific solution.
*
* Mostly I was just giving a heads up about it - since, it seemed to me to
* be very close to what you were talking about. But, since you've probably
* been on this list a lot longer than me - I should have figured you would
* be familiar w/FoxInCloud - and that you had already probably looked into
* it...
*
* L8r,
* -K-
*
* -----Original Message-----
* From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
* Mike Copeland
* Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 5:30 PM
* To: [email protected]
* Subject: Re: Crazy?
*
* yep, have looked at it. It, as I understand it, converts your VFP
* application to HTML forms. Sweet, neat, fun to eat, but not what my goal
*
* is. I'm looking at the backend, not the interface.
*
* Or maybe I missed your point?
*
* Mike
*
* -------- Original Message --------
* Subject: Re: Crazy?
* From: Kurt Wendt <[email protected]>
* To: [email protected]
* Date: 10/16/2012 4:25 PM
*
* Why not look into FoxInCloud - as I believe that is the point of that
* system - and the Developer is here on this list!
*
* -K-
*
* -----Original Message-----
* From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
* Mike Copeland
* Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 5:06 PM
* To: [email protected]
* Subject: Crazy?
*
* Here's what might be a crazy idea...
*
* Instead of using a local Windows or Linux box as a file server for DBF
* files...
*
* What if someone were to set up a Windows share drive from a Cloud drive
* service...like Rackspace offers?
*
* Would that file share source be
* a) acceptable to Foxpro for file locks, buffers, etc
* b) prone to index corruption
* c) speedy enough to serve the purpose?
*
* I'm thinking of a situation where multiple distant locations need to
* access the same files, with mostly reading but some updating.
*
* Anyone doing that? Anyone aware of a reason it would be a bad idea?
*
* I guess the main point would be the speed of the Internet connection...
*
