Brian, a dictionary page for t.
http://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/dtdotu.htm says:

        x u t.y is the product of (x^y) and u t. y .

The complex verb in my previous email was built to satisfy this definition.

Does this make sense?

-- 
Raul

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Brian Schott <schott.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>    ^t.
> %@!
>    *:t.
> {&0 0 1 0x@(3&<.)
>
> Raul,
>
> Why are you expecting the more complex result from `^t.`?
>
> And btw, the result from *: is striking to me because of the x in it. At 
> first I thought it was for the left argument, but the realized it is to force 
> precision.
>
> ---
> (B=)
>
> On Oct 29, 2012, at 9:32 AM, Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In this case, it's doing this:
>>
>>   ^ t.
>> %@!
>>
>> the dictionary definition suggests that we should instead be getting
>> something like this:
>>
>> %@! :(^ * %@!@])"0
>>
>> I'm not sure, though, what good that extra complexity would achieve.
>> It's possible, for example, that that text for the dyadic case of a
>> taylor verb was a half formed thought and what would be useful is
>> something related-but-different.
>>
>> --
>> Raul
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Richard Vaughan <rlvaug...@comcast.net> 
>> wrote:
>>> Not missing any important concept!  Clearly the valuation at x can easily be
>>> done as you suggest.  I was just looking through some J primitives that I
>>> had not used much and came upon this discrepancy between the vocabulary page
>>> and the behavior of the verb in question.   Probably the vocabulary was
>>> wrong, and the verb itself does something not so easily replaceable with a
>>> short definition. But I can't figure out exactly what it is doing.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to